Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dispute concerning taxability of sale of sugar at concessional rate to members required fresh adjudication in light of the directions governing such concessional sales.
Analysis: The issue had not been properly adjudicated by the lower authority in the manner required for giving effect to the controlling directions on concessional sugar sales. The Tribunal found it appropriate to send the matter back for reconsideration so that the issue could be examined afresh on merits and in accordance with law. The assessee was to be afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded for fresh adjudication and the assessee's grounds were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the lower authority has not properly addressed the ative question arising from binding directions, remand for fresh consideration is appropriate, with compliance of natural justice.