TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Acquittal under Section 411 IPC: Insufficient evidence of knowledge or belief regarding stolen goods leads to refund of fines.</h1> <h3>Mohan Lal Versus State of Maharashtra</h3> The SC acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 411 IPC, citing insufficient evidence of his knowledge or belief that the recovered bags were ... - The Supreme Court of India acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code due to lack of evidence showing his knowledge or reason to believe that the recovered bags were stolen property. The prosecution failed to prove that the appellant possessed the stolen property, as there was no evidence linking him directly to the theft or payment for the bags. The mere presence of the appellant at the shop where the goods were delivered was deemed insufficient to establish guilt under Section 411 IPC. Consequently, the appellant was acquitted, and any paid fine was ordered to be refunded.
TaxTMI 
