1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Acquittal under Section 411 IPC: Insufficient evidence of knowledge or belief regarding stolen goods leads to refund of fines.</h1> The SC acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 411 IPC, citing insufficient evidence of his knowledge or belief that the recovered bags were ... - The Supreme Court of India acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code due to lack of evidence showing his knowledge or reason to believe that the recovered bags were stolen property. The prosecution failed to prove that the appellant possessed the stolen property, as there was no evidence linking him directly to the theft or payment for the bags. The mere presence of the appellant at the shop where the goods were delivered was deemed insufficient to establish guilt under Section 411 IPC. Consequently, the appellant was acquitted, and any paid fine was ordered to be refunded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
