Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit of service tax paid on railway freight for transport of inputs, and whether the credit was admissible on the invoices issued by the supplier who had paid the freight and service tax on the appellant's behalf.
Analysis: The inputs were supplied by the seller through railway wagons, freight and service tax were separately shown in the invoice, and the material was received in the appellant's factory without dispute. The freight and tax were paid by the supplier on behalf of the buyer, and the supplier was treated as acting as a pure agent in relation to the transportation charges. On these facts, the credit on the input service of railway freight was held to be available to the appellant.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on railway freight, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.