Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Software license payments to foreign companies don't constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) following Supreme Court precedent</h1> <h3>M/s. SASKEN COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LTD. Versus THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) WARD-2 (1), BENGALURU.</h3> The Karnataka HC ruled in favor of the assessee regarding whether payments to foreign companies for licensed software constitute royalty under section ... Accrual of income in India - treating the payments made to the foreign Companies towards purchase of licensed software as 'royalty' u/s 9(1)(vi) - HELD THAT:- Taking note of the above, in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE (P.) LTD. [2021 (3) TMI 138 - SUPREME COURT] we answer the above question of law in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. Revenue as submits that the Revenue has preferred Review Petition before the Hon'ble Apex Court praying to review the order passed in the case of ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE (P.) LTD., we deem it appropriate to grant liberty to the respondent- Revenue to file review petition based on the outcome of the review pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court and it is for the respondent-Revenue to make out a case for review. Till then question of law is answered in favour of the Assessee The Karnataka High Court heard an appeal by the Assessee challenging the ITAT's decision treating payments to foreign companies for licensed software as 'royalty' under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. The Assessee relied on a Supreme Court case and the Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, quashing the ITAT's order. The Revenue sought to file a review petition based on another Supreme Court case emphasizing finality in litigation, and the Court granted liberty for the Revenue to file a review petition depending on the outcome of the pending review before the Supreme Court. The appeal was allowed, and the order in ITA No. 897/B/2012 was quashed.