Appeal Admitted on Law Questions: Tribunal Decision Challenged Over CBLR 2013 Non-Compliance and Unauthorized Intermediary Use The Calcutta HC admitted an appeal concerning substantial questions of law regarding the Tribunal's decision. The issues involve the justification for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Admitted on Law Questions: Tribunal Decision Challenged Over CBLR 2013 Non-Compliance and Unauthorized Intermediary Use
The Calcutta HC admitted an appeal concerning substantial questions of law regarding the Tribunal's decision. The issues involve the justification for setting aside the original order due to the respondent's non-compliance with CBLR 2013 conditions and the correctness of the Tribunal's order given the respondent's use of intermediaries for authorization without job clearance from the exporter. The appellant must file informal paper books within two weeks, with a hearing set for February 10, 2021.
The Calcutta High Court admitted an appeal for consideration based on substantial questions of law. The questions include whether setting aside the original order by the Tribunal is justified when the respondent did not comply with specified conditions under the CBLR 2013, and whether the Tribunal's order is correct given that the respondent obtained authorization through intermediaries after filing the shipping bill without obtaining job clearance from the exporter. The appellant is directed to file informal paper books within two weeks, and the appeal is scheduled for a hearing on February 10, 2021.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
