Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Allows Paper Tax Return for 2022-23; Deductions u/s 80-IE Valid with Positive Income; Rule 12 Challenge Issued.</h1> <h3>Lupin Limited, Mumbai. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-3 (4), Mumbai and ors.</h3> Lupin Limited, Mumbai. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax-3 (4), Mumbai and ors. - TMI ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe core legal questions considered in this judgment include: Whether the petitioner can file a return of income under ITR-6 when the utility programmed for electronic filing does not permit the filing due to the absence of positive income under the head 'profits and gains' from business. Whether the petitioner is entitled to claim deductions under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, specifically under section 80-IE, when the Gross Total Income is positive, irrespective of the business income being non-positive. Whether the petitioner can be granted ad-interim relief to file a paper return of income due to the limitations of the electronic filing utility. Whether there is a constitutional challenge to the vires of Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules, necessitating notice to the Attorney General for India.ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSISRelevant legal framework and precedents:The petitioner relies on the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Income Tax -1 Vs. Reliance Energy Limited, which interprets section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The Court in that decision held that deductions under section 80-IA are not limited to income under the head 'business' only but can be set off against the 'gross total income.'Court's interpretation and reasoning:The Court observed that the decision in the Reliance Energy case pertains to deductions under section 80-IA, which is similar to section 80-IE under which the petitioner seeks to claim deductions. Both sections fall under Chapter VI-A of the Act and involve deductions related to profits and gains derived from eligible businesses.Key evidence and findings:The Court noted that the utility for electronic filing of returns does not allow the petitioner to file a return due to the absence of positive business income. However, the petitioner's Gross Total Income is positive, which should allow them to file the return and claim deductions under section 80-IE.Application of law to facts:The Court applied the legal principles from the Reliance Energy case to the facts at hand, concluding that the petitioner should be allowed to file the return since the Gross Total Income is positive, even if the business income is not. The Court also considered previous ad-interim orders in similar cases where paper returns were permitted due to software limitations.Treatment of competing arguments:The petitioner's argument that the deductions should be allowed against Gross Total Income was supported by the Reliance Energy precedent. The Court did not find any substantial counter-arguments from the respondents at this stage, leading to the granting of ad-interim relief.Conclusions:The Court concluded that the petitioner should be permitted to file a paper return for the assessment year 2022-23, pending the final outcome of the petition. The Court also issued notice to the Attorney General for India concerning the constitutional challenge to Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules.SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGSPreserve verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning:The Court emphasized, 'Prima facie therefore we are of the view that even if petitioner does not have positive income under the head 'profits and gains' from business but the Gross Total Income is in the positive, then petitioner should be permitted to file its return.'Core principles established: The deductions under Chapter VI-A, including section 80-IE, are not restricted to positive business income but can be claimed against Gross Total Income if it is positive. Technical limitations of electronic filing utilities should not impede a taxpayer's ability to file returns and claim legitimate deductions.Final determinations on each issue: The petitioner is allowed to file a paper return for the assessment year 2022-23, subject to the final outcome of the petition. The Court recognized the need for a constitutional review of Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules and issued notice to the Attorney General for India.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found