Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (8) TMI 1430 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessment Order Invalidated: Missing Mandatory Notice u/s 143(2) Voids Additions by Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the assessment order was invalid due to the failure to issue a mandatory notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, which ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Assessment Order Invalidated: Missing Mandatory Notice u/s 143(2) Voids Additions by Assessing Officer.

                              The Tribunal held that the assessment order was invalid due to the failure to issue a mandatory notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, which is a jurisdictional requirement. The absence of this notice rendered the assessment order void ab initio. Consequently, any additions made by the Assessing Officer in the reassessment proceedings were also deemed void, as they were based on an invalid assessment order. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that awareness of proceedings does not substitute the legal requirement of serving the notice.




                              1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                              The core legal questions presented and considered in this judgment are:

                              • Whether the assessment order passed without issuing a notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act is valid.
                              • Whether the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the reassessment proceedings are justified.

                              2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                              Issue 1: Validity of Assessment Order Without Notice Under Section 143(2)

                              • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act mandates that a notice must be served to the assessee if the Assessing Officer intends to scrutinize the return filed. The absence of such a notice is considered a jurisdictional defect, rendering the assessment order invalid.
                              • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal emphasized that the issuance of a notice under section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement for the validity of an assessment order. The failure to issue this notice constitutes a jurisdictional error that cannot be rectified subsequently.
                              • Key Evidence and Findings: It was conceded by the Departmental Representative that there was no evidence in the assessment record of a notice under section 143(2) being issued. This admission was pivotal in the Tribunal's decision.
                              • Application of Law to Facts: Given the absence of the notice, the Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was void ab initio, as it was fundamentally flawed due to the lack of jurisdiction.
                              • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The assessee argued that the non-issuance of the notice rendered the assessment order invalid, while the Department contended that the assessee was aware of the proceedings. However, the Tribunal held that awareness does not substitute the legal requirement of serving a notice under section 143(2).
                              • Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the assessment order was invalid due to the non-issuance of the mandatory notice under section 143(2).

                              Issue 2: Justification of Additions Made in Reassessment

                              • Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The reassessment proceedings are governed by section 147 of the Income Tax Act, which allows the AO to reassess income if there is reason to believe that income has escaped assessment.
                              • Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions made by the AO, as the primary ground of the invalidity of the assessment order was upheld.
                              • Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal noted that since the assessment order itself was invalid, any subsequent additions made therein were also void.
                              • Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal applied the principle that an invalid assessment order cannot sustain any additions, irrespective of their merits.
                              • Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal did not address the arguments regarding the additions, as the invalidity of the assessment order rendered these discussions academic.
                              • Conclusions: The Tribunal did not make a determination on the validity of the additions due to the primary issue of the invalid assessment order.

                              3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                              • Preserve Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: "It is an admitted position under the law that assessment order passed without issuing notice under section 143(2) is invalid."
                              • Core Principles Established: The issuance of a notice under section 143(2) is a jurisdictional requirement for the validity of an assessment order. An assessment order passed without such notice is void ab initio.
                              • Final Determinations on Each Issue: The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the assessment order was invalid due to the non-issuance of notice under section 143(2), rendering any discussion on the merits of the additions academic.

                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found