Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight and transport charges separately shown in the invoice and incurred on actual basis could be included in the sale price or assessable value under the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the statutory definition of sale price and the effect of the explanation excluding freight and other transportation expenses when they are incurred for or on behalf of the buyer and charged separately in the invoice. The impugned order recorded a factual finding that the goods were sold on ex-work basis, the freight component was separately reflected in the invoices, and only actual transportation expense was recovered. On those facts, no extra consideration was received towards freight, and the amount could not be treated as part of the assessable value. The precedent relied upon by the revenue was distinguished because the statutory provisions were not pari materia and the factual setting was different.
Conclusion: Freight and transport charges separately charged in the invoice did not form part of the sale price or assessable value, and the revision was liable to fail.
Ratio Decidendi: Where freight or transportation expense is separately charged in the invoice and is shown to be actual expenditure incurred for the buyer, it is excluded from sale price and assessable value under the relevant sales tax statutes.