TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chandigarh allows legal spouse to continue proceedings u/r 22 after proprietor's death, hearing set for 12/11/2024.</h1> <h3>M/s Sayshya Marketing Services Versus Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ludhiana</h3> M/s Sayshya Marketing Services Versus Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ludhiana - TMI The judgment from the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh involves a miscellaneous application filed under Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The application was submitted by the counsel for the appellant, Shri Poojan Malhotra, on behalf of the appellant, M/s Sayshya Marketing Services, following the death of its proprietor, Shri Jaideep Bhardwaj, on 24.09.2020. The legal spouse of the deceased expressed interest in continuing the proceedings. The tribunal, comprising Hon'ble Mr. S. S. Garg, Member (Judicial), and Hon'ble Mr. P. Anjani Kumar, Member (Technical), allowed the application. The registry was directed to list the matter for hearing on 11.12.2024. The order was 'dictated and pronounced in the open court.'
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
