Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to depreciation at 30% on earth moving vehicles under the relevant entry in Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962, and whether the revisional order under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could lawfully restrict depreciation to 15%.
Analysis: The factual position was not in dispute. The Tribunal relied on the nature of the vehicles and the applicable entry in Appendix I, along with judicial precedents on the treatment of such vehicles for depreciation purposes. It held that the assessing officer had correctly allowed depreciation at 30% and that the Commissioner's interference under Section 263 was not justified on the facts.
Conclusion: The claim for depreciation at 30% was upheld and the revisional restriction to 15% was not sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the relevant facts are undisputed and the asset falls within the higher-depreciation entry in the Rules, revisional interference to reduce depreciation is unwarranted.