TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act was governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and whether the application was time-barred.
Analysis: The Court applied the settled position that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications presented to a Civil Court under any Act, including an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act. On the facts, the right to apply arose when the final bill was passed and the no claim certificate was issued, and the application was filed more than three years thereafter.
Conclusion: Article 137 applied, and the application under Section 20 was barred by limitation.
TaxTMI 
