Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT Mumbai Adjusts Net Profit Estimate to 6% Due to Recurring Losses and Insufficient Verification.</h1> <h3>Pumpkin Pictures Private Limited Versus Dy. CIT, Central Circle -2, Thane (West)</h3> The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the net profit estimation to 6% of the gross receipt, instead of ... Rejection of books of accounts - estimation of Net profit - AO had estimated business income of the assessee being 20% of the gross receipt - HELD THAT:- As perused the audited accounts i.e profit and loss and balance sheet filed in the paper book which demonstrate that the assessee company was formed in the F.Y. 2009-10 and year under consideration was the second year of operation of the company but the assessee company had incurred recurring losses since its formation. We find it is unreasonable to estimate the net profit of the assessee company @ 20% of gross receipt however after considering the aforesaid facts of recurring losses incurred by the assessee company we consider that it is reasonable to restrict the net profit @ 6% of the gross receipt for want of verification by the AO since the assessee has failed to furnish all the supporting bills/vouchers during the course of assessment. We direct the assessing officer accordingly. Therefore, the grounds of appeal of the assessee are partly allowed. Issues:1. Estimation of income under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Rejection of books of account and bills/vouchers by the Assessing Officer.3. Treatment of income received from G.D. Foods Mfg. (India) Pvt Ltd.4. Dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) and confirmation of estimated income.5. Failure to file return of income and audit report.6. Reasonableness of estimating net profit at 20% of gross receipt.7. Consideration of recurring losses incurred by the assessee company.Analysis:1. The appeal was filed against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the income estimation of Rs. 50,09,956, 20% of Gross Receipt, under section 145(3) for A.Y. 2011-12. The company had suffered a loss before depreciation, challenging the estimation.2. The Assessing Officer invoked section 145(3) and rejected the Books of Account and Bills/Vouchers, despite being audited by a Statutory Auditor. The non-filing of the Audit Report under section 44AB by the Auditor was highlighted.3. The CIT(A) confirmed the estimation of income at Rs. 85,000, being 20% of Rs. 4,25,000, received from G.D. Foods Mfg. (India) Pvt Ltd. The appellant reconciled the income as per 26AS statement with the gross receipt.4. The CIT(A) partially dismissed the appeal by confirming the estimated income of Rs. 50,94,956, leading to the appeal before the ITAT Mumbai.5. The company failed to file its return of income under section 139, resulting in the case being reopened under section 147. The Assessing Officer estimated the business income at 20% of the gross receipt and added it to the total income.6. The ITAT Mumbai considered the substantial receipt without a filed return and the failure to produce bills/vouchers. The Tribunal noted the appointment of a new Chartered Accountant and the deletion of penalty under section 271B by the coordinate bench.7. The audited accounts showed recurring losses since the formation of the company in F.Y. 2009-10, with the second year under consideration. The ITAT found it unreasonable to estimate net profit at 20% of gross receipt and restricted it to 6% due to the recurring losses.8. Considering the circumstances and recurring losses, the ITAT allowed the appeal partly, directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the net profit at 6% of the gross receipt due to the lack of verification from the assessee.9. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed by the ITAT Mumbai, with the order pronounced on 20.06.2023.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found