Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the exemption notification governing incentive benefit for higher production, a factory was required to have clearances not only before 1 April 1980 but also in each of the financial years 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83 to qualify for the benefit.
Analysis: The notification was construed as a scheme meant to grant additional benefit for higher production. Condition (iv) was read along with the definition of the base period and the reference to the relevant production years. The wording was considered somewhat ambiguous, but the structure of the notification showed that the year 1980-81 was relevant only for the eligibility condition in clause (iv) and not for computing the base period. On a harmonious reading, the notification contemplated clearances prior to 1 April 1980 and clearances in each of the three financial years 1980-81, 1981-82 and 1982-83.
Conclusion: The requirement was cumulative, and the assessee was not entitled to the incentive benefit.