1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court interprets Notification on production incentives under Central Excise Act</h1> The Supreme Court interpreted a Notification from 1981 regarding an incentive scheme for higher production under the Central Excise Act. The issue ... Exemption Issues: Interpretation of Notification dated 1st March, 1981 for incentive scheme for higher production.In this judgment, the Supreme Court considered the interpretation of a Notification dated 1st March, 1981, which provided an incentive scheme for higher production under the Central Excise Act. The notification stated that factories clearing goods for home consumption in excess of base clearances during a specific period would be entitled to certain excise duty benefits. The issue revolved around Condition No. (iv) of the notification, which required clearances in specific financial years. The appellants were denied benefits due to not meeting the conditions outlined in this clause. The Tribunal concluded that the appellants needed clearances in each of the financial years 1980-81, 1981-82, and 1982-83 to qualify for the benefits. The Court agreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, emphasizing the importance of clearances in the specified years as per the notification's requirements. The judgment highlighted the ambiguity in the wording but clarified that the intention was to reward higher production. It was emphasized that while the year 1980-81 was relevant for Condition No. (iv), it did not play a role in determining the base period for benefits. The Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that clearances before April 1, 1980, and in the specified financial years were necessary for eligibility, ensuring the harmonization of the notification's provisions. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed with no order as to costs.