Company winding up petition dismissed after settlement proposal with Rs. 10 lakh cheque and 10% interest repayment terms

Karnataka HC dismissed a company winding up petition after the respondent company proposed settlement terms including a Rs. 10,00,000 cheque and repayment of remaining amount with 10% interest. The court directed additional interest of Rs. 75,000 on the Rs. 31,00,000 already paid. Finding the respondent capable of meeting its commitments, the court concluded winding up would be unjust and unfair, accepting the company's undertaking for repayment per the settlement proposal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Breach of contract and failure to deliver possession of the apartment within the stipulated time frame.
2. Dispute over the amount paid by the petitioner and the balance amount claimed by the respondent.
3. Allegation of inability to repay debts and the petition for winding up.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner alleged breach of contract by the respondent for failing to deliver possession of the apartment within the agreed timeframe. The respondent claimed delays were due to unavoidable circumstances and that the agreement allowed for extensions in such cases. The respondent argued that the contract was not subject to termination but only attracted damages. The petitioner demanded a refund with interest, alleging misuse of funds by the respondent, leading to the winding up petition.

2. Dispute arose over the amount paid by the petitioner and the balance claimed by the respondent. The petitioner made payments totaling Rs. 50,25,954/- as per the Construction Agreement. The respondent contended that a balance of Rs. 11,68,600/- was due, considering the total cost of the apartment. The respondent also mentioned additional expenses not covered by the payments made by the petitioner, disputing the existence of a crystallized debt.

3. The respondent proposed a settlement by repaying the remaining amount with interest at 10%. The petitioner argued that the lack of interest payment on the substantial sum already paid raised concerns about the respondent's ability to meet its commitments. The court directed the respondent to pay interest on the amount already paid and concluded that the respondent could meet its obligations, dismissing the winding up petition.

In conclusion, the court found that the respondent's proposed repayment plan, along with the additional interest directed by the court, demonstrated the respondent's ability to meet its commitments. The court dismissed the winding up petition based on the satisfaction that the respondent could repay the outstanding amount as proposed, including the interest on the amount already paid.

---