Assessee wins on AMP transfer pricing adjustment deletion and Section 43B leave encashment deduction allowance

ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues. The tribunal deleted AMP transfer pricing adjustment and mark-up following precedents from Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications cases. For leave encashment deduction under Section 43B, the tribunal directed AO to allow deduction on actual payment basis, citing Hewlett Packard precedent. The TDS credit issue was remanded to AO for examination and appropriate credit grant per law.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment on Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) Expenses.
2. Corporate Tax Issues: Deduction for Leave Encashment and Credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment on Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) Expenses:

The primary issue in this case concerns the TP adjustment of INR 1,25,18,85,488 related to AMP expenses. The assessee, a company engaged in importing computer peripherals from its Associate Enterprises (AEs) for sale in India, faced a TP adjustment made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) concerning AMP expenses. The TPO accepted the benchmark analysis of other international transactions but made an adjustment for AMP expenses, alleging them to be an international transaction. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld this adjustment.

The Tribunal, however, referred to its previous decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2012-2013, where it followed the Delhi High Court's rulings in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. CIT and Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT. The Tribunal emphasized that AMP expenses cannot be considered an international transaction in the absence of any tangible evidence of an arrangement or understanding with the AE. It reiterated that the Revenue's use of the Bright Line Test (BLT) for determining AMP expenses as an international transaction is not legally recognized. The Tribunal concluded that since the TPO had accepted the arm's length price (ALP) of other transactions at the entity level, it was inappropriate to treat AMP expenses separately. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the TP adjustment related to AMP expenses.

2. Corporate Tax Issues:

Deduction for Leave Encashment:

The assessee sought a deduction of INR 1,55,96,001 for leave encashment payments under Section 43B(f) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal, referencing its previous decision and the Supreme Court's ruling in UOI v. Exide Industries Ltd, upheld the constitutional validity of Section 43B(f). It directed the Assessing Officer (A.O.) to verify actual payments made during the relevant assessment year and allow deductions based on actual payments, ensuring no double deduction occurs. The issue was remanded to the A.O. for verification and appropriate deduction.

Credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS):

The assessee claimed that the A.O. did not grant appropriate TDS credit. The Tribunal restored this issue to the A.O. for examination and directed the granting of TDS credit in accordance with the law.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the TP adjustment on AMP expenses and remanding the corporate tax issues for further verification and appropriate action by the A.O. The order was pronounced on December 7, 2022.

---