TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>India's Supreme Court Upholds Decision, Rejects High Court's View on Finance Act 1994 Clause.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX DELHI Versus M/s SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICE LTD</h3> The SC of India dismissed the Civil Appeal, affirming the decision to set aside the Show Cause Notice. The SC did not support the HC's interpretation of ... Classification of activities of wireline logging and perforation during the relevant period from 14.05.2003 to 31.03.2008 - technical testing and analysis services or not - whether the term 'technical testing and analysis agency' has been defined under section 65(107) of the Finance Act? - HELD THAT:- As far as the order setting aside the Show Cause Notice is concerned, we find that there is no scope for interference. However, we make it clear that we have not given our imprimatur to the finding recorded by the High Court on the interpretation of clause (e) of Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994. Subject to what is observed above, the Civil Appeal is dismissed. The Supreme Court of India dismissed the Civil Appeal, stating there is no interference with the order setting aside the Show Cause Notice. The Court did not endorse the High Court's interpretation of clause (e) of Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994.
TaxTMI 
