Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Charitable Trust Wins ITAT Appeal: Delay in Filing Form-10B Condoned, Income Exemption Granted Under Tax Law.</h1> <h3>Manav Seva Trust Versus A.O., Ward-1 (4), Kolkata.</h3> The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, a charitable Trust, by condoning the delay in filing Form-10B, thus granting the income exemption initially ... Denial of exemption u/s 11 - appellant had not filed Form-10B - appellant is a registered Trust u/s 12A of the Act and the claim of exemption of income was denied u/s 143(1) - HELD THAT:- In Hari Gyan Pracharak Trust [2023 (6) TMI 923 - ITAT AHMEDABAD] has held that since filing of Form-10B is merely a procedural requirement, any defect in that is curable. It is seen that the Hon'ble Orissa High Court in the case of Oneness Educational and Charitable Trust [2024 (4) TMI 500 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] has held that the oversight in not filing Form-10B within the due date was to be condoned and the exemption was to be allowed and granted. Also, the Hon'ble Telangana High Court in the case of Global Organisation for Development [2024 (5) TMI 1171 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT] has held that the delay on the part of the assessee in submitting Form-10B was to be condoned and the matter remanded back to the file of the AO for passing appropriate order on merits. Also in Al Jamia Mohammediyah Education Society [2024 (4) TMI 939 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] held that where the assessee Trust belatedly submitted Form-10B, along with return, on account of oversight by the Chartered Accountant, the delay in filing of Form-10B deserves to be condoned. Thus delay in filing of Form-10B is hereby condoned and it is directed that the appellant be allowed exemption as would be due to him as per law. The ld. AO is directed accordingly. Appeal filed by the assessee allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Denial of exemption of income for a charitable Trust due to non-filing of Form-10B.2. Appeal against the denial of exemption filed before ITAT.3. Argument for condonation of delay in filing Form-10B.4. Comparison with relevant case laws supporting condonation of delay.5. Decision on condonation of delay and granting of exemption.The judgment pertains to the denial of income exemption for a charitable Trust due to the non-filing of Form-10B, as processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the disallowance of the exemption, citing the failure to submit Form-10B within the specified due date. The appellant approached the ITAT, arguing that the Trust, being registered under section 12A of the Act, was eligible for the claimed exemption. The appellant contended that the failure to file Form-10B was an oversight, which should be considered a curable defect and not a fatal illegality.The ITAT considered submissions from both parties and reviewed relevant case laws. The ITAT noted the case of Hari Gyan Pracharak Trust vs. DCIT, where a similar procedural defect was deemed curable. Additionally, decisions from the Orissa High Court, Telangana High Court, and Bombay High Court supported the condonation of delays in filing Form-10B for charitable Trusts. The Bombay High Court emphasized that oversight by the Chartered Accountant should not prejudice the Trust, especially when the delay was unintentional.Consequently, the ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, condoning the delay in filing Form-10B and directing the granting of the exemption as per the law. The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing that the delay was not intentional or deliberate. The judgment highlights the importance of considering genuine hardships faced by charitable Trusts due to procedural errors and the need for a balanced and equitable approach in such cases.The judgment underscores the significance of condoning delays in procedural requirements for charitable Trusts to prevent undue prejudice based on unintentional errors. It sets a precedent for considering the specific circumstances of each case and exercising discretionary powers to ensure fairness and uphold the objectives of income tax laws concerning charitable organizations.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found