TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT Hyderabad's Order, Dismisses Appeals and Condones Delay in Filing, Finalizing Decision.</h1> <h3>Little Star Foods Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad Etc.</h3> The SC dismissed the appeals, affirming the CESTAT, Hyderabad's order. The delay in filing was condoned, finalizing the Tribunal's decision. - Little Star ... Job-work - manufacture of “Cadbury Perk with Glucose Energy” on behalf of M/s Mondelez - benefit of N/N. 03/2006 (Sl. No. 19) - Inclusion of dealer’s margin, RD markup and post manufacturing expenses claimed by the appellant in assessable value - extended period of limitation - demand of differential duty alongwith interest - imposition of penalties - it was held by CESTAT that 'There is no evidence on record to show that this actually pertains to R&D expenses. Therefore, inclusion of R&D mark up in the assessable value is not sustainable and it deserves to be set aside.' HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 6 August 2019 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Regional Bench, Hyderabad. Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Regional Bench, Hyderabad. Delay was condoned.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
