Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (9) TMI 1674 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        WhatsApp must delete pre-2016 user data and cannot share existing data with Facebook pending privacy rights decision Delhi HC directed WhatsApp to protect user privacy by ordering that users deleting accounts before 25.09.2016 must have their data completely removed from ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            WhatsApp must delete pre-2016 user data and cannot share existing data with Facebook pending privacy rights decision

                            Delhi HC directed WhatsApp to protect user privacy by ordering that users deleting accounts before 25.09.2016 must have their data completely removed from servers without sharing with Facebook. For continuing users, existing data up to 25.09.2016 cannot be shared with Facebook or its group companies. The court noted privacy rights remain undecided by SC in K.S. Puttaswamy case and directed authorities to consider bringing internet messaging applications under statutory regulatory framework. Petition disposed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Sharing of user data by WhatsApp with Facebook.
                            2. Protection and safety of privacy of WhatsApp users.
                            3. Regulation of internet messaging services under statutory framework.
                            4. Consent mechanism for WhatsApp's new privacy policy.
                            5. Fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Sharing of User Data by WhatsApp with Facebook:
                            The petitioners, users of WhatsApp, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to prohibit WhatsApp from sharing user data with Facebook and its group companies. They argued that WhatsApp's proposed change in privacy policy, which allows sharing user account information with Facebook, infringes on the fundamental rights of users. The court noted that WhatsApp's initial privacy policy guaranteed complete protection of user data, but this changed after Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014. The court acknowledged that users voluntarily opted for WhatsApp's services, agreeing to its terms of service, which included potential changes in privacy policy.

                            2. Protection and Safety of Privacy of WhatsApp Users:
                            The petitioners contended that the change in privacy policy without adequately informing users was unfair and violated their right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution. They claimed that the manner of obtaining user consent was deceptive, as many users could not comprehend the implications of the new terms. The court, however, emphasized that users have the option to delete their accounts if they do not agree with the new policy, which would ensure their data is deleted from WhatsApp's servers.

                            3. Regulation of Internet Messaging Services Under Statutory Framework:
                            The court noted that the Union of India and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) were also respondents in the case. The court highlighted that while TRAI regulates Internet Service Providers, internet messaging applications like WhatsApp are not yet under statutory regulatory framework. The court referred to ongoing consultations by TRAI on regulatory frameworks for Over-The-Top (OTT) services, indicating that steps towards regulation were in progress.

                            4. Consent Mechanism for WhatsApp's New Privacy Policy:
                            The petitioners suggested that WhatsApp should provide a clear "Don't Share" option for users who do not want their data shared with Facebook. They also argued that past user information should not be shared without explicit consent. The court noted WhatsApp's affidavit, which stated that users could opt out of data sharing within 30 days of accepting the new terms. The court directed that users who delete their accounts before the specified date should have their data completely removed from WhatsApp's servers.

                            5. Fundamental Right to Privacy Under Article 21 of the Constitution of India:
                            The court acknowledged the petitioners' argument that the new privacy policy infringed on the right to privacy. However, it pointed out that the legal position on the fundamental right to privacy was yet to be authoritatively decided, referring to the pending case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. The court concluded that since WhatsApp's terms of service were not based on any statutory provisions, the issue was not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court disposed of the writ petition with the following directions:
                            1. Users who delete their WhatsApp accounts before 25.09.2016 will have their data completely deleted from WhatsApp's servers and not shared with Facebook.
                            2. For users who remain on WhatsApp, their existing data up to 25.09.2016 will not be shared with Facebook.
                            3. The Union of India and TRAI should consider regulating internet messaging applications like WhatsApp under a statutory framework.

                            The court emphasized the voluntary nature of users' agreement to WhatsApp's terms and the option to delete accounts if they disagreed with the new privacy policy.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found