Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Treats Income Tax Assessment as Draft, Ensures Right to Be Heard Before Finalizing Order in Violation Case.</h1> <h3>Biki Overseas Private Limited & Anr. Versus The Union of India & Ors.</h3> The HC of Calcutta, in an intra-Court appeal, addressed the appellants' challenge to an assessment order under the Income Tax Act, citing a violation of ... Validity of assessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- It is no doubt true that the impugned order is an appealable order and the appellate authority can re-examine the factual position. However, the opportunity which the assessee is entitled to before the original authority can never be replaced to that of the opportunity before the appellate authority. As in the case of Tin Box Company, New Delhi [2001 (2) TMI 13 - SUPREME COURT] held that the assessment order made by the ITO without giving a proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee was bad in law. It was held that the possibility of placing of evidence by the assessee before the appellate authorities would be of no use to hold the said order valid. We are of the view that ends of justice would be met if an opportunity is granted to the assessee to go before the AO. For such reason, we are not inclined to quash the assessment order dated 23rd March, 2022, which shall be treated as draft assessment order and the appellants shall be permitted to put in their objections within a period that will be indicated by the AO within a week from the date of receipt of the server copy of this order. After filing of the objections, the AO shall proceed to complete the assessment in terms of the procedure laid down by the National Faceless Assessment Centre. Assuming an appeal had been preferred before the CIT (A), it would not be of any consequence as we have directed the AO to take a fresh decision in the matter. Issues: Challenge to assessment order under Income Tax Act based on violation of principles of natural justice.The High Court of Calcutta heard an intra-Court appeal against an assessment order dated 23rd March, 2022 under sections 147 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellants contended that they were unable to respond to the show cause notice due to ill health, seeking an opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer. The Single Bench held that there was no violation of natural justice, as the assessment order was appealable, dismissing the writ petition. The appellants then appealed this decision. The appellants requested an opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer for a fair assessment based on available material. The respondents argued that the writ petition was rightly dismissed, as ample opportunity was provided before the ex-parte assessment order was passed. However, no specific details were provided regarding the stage of the present appeal or the filing of an appeal before the CIT (A).The Court noted that while the assessment order was appealable, the opportunity before the original authority could not be replaced by an opportunity before the appellate authority. Citing the Tin Box Company case, the Court emphasized that an assessment order made without proper hearing was invalid, and the possibility of presenting evidence before appellate authorities did not cure this defect. In light of the circumstances, the Court decided not to quash the assessment order but treated it as a draft order. The appellants were granted the opportunity to submit objections to the Assessing Officer within a specified period after receiving the order. The Assessing Officer was directed to complete the assessment following the procedures of the National Faceless Assessment Centre.The Court clarified that even if an appeal had been filed before the CIT (A), it would not impact the fresh decision directed to be taken by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the Court disposed of the appeal and related application without costs. The parties were to receive an urgent certified copy of the order upon completion of legal formalities.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found