Retail-pack valuation and duty collection rules limit Section 4A and Section 11D treatment for confectionery packs.

Sugar confectionery sold in 500-gram wholesale packs, where each individual piece weighed less than 10 grams, was held not to attract valuation under Section 4A because the relevant unit for assessment was the individual piece, not the outer pack, and no retail sale price was required to be affixed under the applicable Packaged Commodities Rules. The goods were therefore assessable under Section 4. The demand under Section 11D was also found unsustainable because that provision applies only where duty is actually collected from the buyer and not deposited with the Government; here, credit notes were issued and the differential amount was not retained as collected duty.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether sugar confectionery packed in 500 grams packs, where each individual piece weighs less than 10 grams, is liable to valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under Section 4 of that Act; (ii) Whether the demand confirmed under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether sugar confectionery packed in 500 grams packs, where each individual piece weighs less than 10 grams, is liable to valuation under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under Section 4 of that Act.

Analysis: The governing principle applied was that the relevant unit for assessment is the individual confectionery piece and not the wholesale pack. The earlier decision in the appellant's own case had held that a wholesale pack of 500 grams to 1 kg is not a retail pack, and the approval of that view by the Supreme Court was treated as settling the issue. Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, as applicable to the period in question, exempted packages of goods of ten grams or less from the requirement of affixing retail sale price. The amendment to Rule 2(j) was held not to alter that legal position.

Conclusion: The goods were not liable to valuation under Section 4A and were assessable under Section 4.

Issue (ii): Whether the demand confirmed under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was sustainable.

Analysis: Section 11D applies only where duty is collected from the buyer and is not deposited with the Government. On the facts, the duty shown in the invoices was not retained as collected duty because credit notes were issued to customers and the differential amount was not actually collected. In these circumstances, the essential condition for invoking Section 11D was not satisfied.

Conclusion: The demand under Section 11D was not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed, the dispute being covered by the settled legal position in the appellant's own matter.

Ratio Decidendi: For confectionery sold in wholesale packs, valuation under Section 4A is not attracted where the individual packed commodity is below the statutory retail-pack threshold and no retail sale price is required to be affixed; Section 11D applies only to duty actually collected from the buyer.

---