1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Upholds Disallowance of Late Employee Contributions to Provident Fund/ESIC for 2018-19 Due to Non-Appearance.</h1> The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte regarding the disallowance of employees' contributions to the Provident Fund/ESIC for Assessment Year ... Disallowance of employees contribution to Provident Fund/ESIC u/s 36(i)(va) r.w.s. 43B - Assessment u/s 143(1) - HELD THAT:- The issue towards taxability of belated employees contribution to Provident Fund/ESIC is no longer res integra in the light of the judgement of the Honβble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services (P.) Ltd. [2022 (10) TMI 617 - SUPREME COURT] The co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in Cemetile Industries [2022 (12) TMI 354 - ITAT PUNE] had expressed a view that such adjustment/disallowance is also permissible in the proceedings carried out u/s 143(1) of the Act. Very recently, in Savleen Kaur & Others [2023 (2) TMI 51 - ITAT DELHI] for AY 2018-19 & in BT Data and Surveying Services India Pvt. Ltd. [2023 (2) TMI 1329 - ITAT DELHI] has also taken a similar view and upheld the action of the Revenue. In parity with the view taken by Co-ordinate Benches, we do not see any merit in the appeal of the assessee. We thus, do not see any warrant to any reason to interfere with the order of Ld.CIT(A). Appeal of the assessee is dismissed ex-parte. The appeal was filed against an order concerning Assessment Year 2018-19 regarding the disallowance of employees' contribution to Provident Fund/ESIC. The assessee did not appear for the hearing, leading to an ex-parte proceeding. The Revenue supported the disallowance based on late deposits, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue's action, citing previous judgments, and dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte.