Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Allows Deduction of INR 250 Crore for Technical Know-How Fees as Revenue Expenditure for 2016-17.</h1> <h3>Honda Motorcycle and Scooters India Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle 4 (1), Gurugram</h3> The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to permit the deduction of INR 250,17,14,636 for technical know-how fees as revenue expenditure ... Nature of expenses - deduction of expenses in respect of Technical know-how duly claimed - assessee is a resident corporate entity and is a subsidiary of Honda Motorcycle Co. Ltd., Japan - AO observed that the claim cannot be allowed as the assessee should have claimed it in the return of income filed for the impugned assessment year. HELD THAT:- We find, the issue, whether, technical know-how fee paid is in the nature of capital or revenue expenditure is a legacy issue and is continuing from preceding assessment years. While, deciding the issue in the immediately preceding assessment year i.e. assessment year 2015-16 [2021 (5) TMI 949 - ITAT DELHI] the Tribunal, in the order referred to above, followed its earlier decision and allowed assessee’s claim as held because the amount expended is in relation to the running royalty and not for the purpose of setting up of plant. As decided in in the case of Honda Siel Cars [2017 (6) TMI 524 - SUPREME COURT] observed that the Supreme Court has carved out the distinction between the payments at the time of setting up of the manufacturing facility and the payments made once the manufacturing process has already began. In the former case, royalty expenditure for setting up the manufacturing facility is capital in nature while in the latter case, the royalty expense is revenue in nature. Applying the said ratio, we are of the view that the assessee was entitled to claim the aforesaid expenditure as revenue expenditure in the hands of the assessee. Decided in favour of assessee. Issues:Challenge to final assessment order under Section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2016-17.Detailed Analysis:1. The appeal was filed challenging the final assessment order dated 30.03.2016 passed under Section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2016-17. The appeal was filed by the assessee against the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).2. The Tribunal had earlier disposed of the appeal on 09.11.2021 but inadvertently left out ground no. 10 raised by the assessee. The Tribunal recalled the appellate order for the limited purpose of deciding ground no.10 upon the miscellaneous application filed by the assessee in MA No. 214/Del/2021.3. Ground no. 10 pertained to the deduction of expenses of INR 250,17,14,636/- in respect of Technical know-how claimed by the assessee before the Assessing Officer and DRP. The Assessing Officer and DRP had initially disallowed the deduction.4. The assessee, a resident corporate entity engaged in manufacturing and distribution of motorcycles, had paid Rs.250,17,14,636 towards technical know-how fee in the impugned assessment year but did not claim it as a deduction initially.5. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim stating it should have been claimed in the return of income for the relevant assessment year. The DRP upheld this decision based on its direction in the assessee's own case for the preceding assessment year.6. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions of both parties, referred to its earlier decision in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2015-16 where a similar issue was decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal allowed the deduction of technical know-how payment as a revenue expenditure.7. The Tribunal noted that the issue of whether the technical know-how fee is capital or revenue expenditure was a legacy issue continuing from preceding assessment years. Given the consistent view of the Tribunal in the assessee's own case, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee in respect of technical know-how payment for the impugned assessment year.8. The Tribunal pronounced the order on 15th March 2023, allowing the assessee's appeal and directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction claimed by the assessee for the technical know-how payment.This detailed analysis covers the key aspects of the judgment, including the issues raised, the arguments presented by both parties, and the final decision rendered by the Tribunal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found