Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance of belated employees' contribution to Provident Fund/ESIC under section 36(1)(va) read with section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable, and whether such adjustment was permissible under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue of taxability of delayed employees' contribution was treated as settled in view of the binding Supreme Court ruling that belated employees' contribution is taxable under section 2(24)(x) and deduction under section 36(1)(va) is not available where payment is delayed. The Tribunal also followed co-ordinate bench decisions holding that the resulting disallowance can be made in processing under section 143(1) where the audit report itself reflects the delay.
Conclusion: The disallowance and the adjustment under section 143(1) were upheld, and the assessee's challenge failed.