Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee wins capital gains dispute as ITAT follows own precedent setting land rate at Rs. 200 per square meter</h1> <h3>I.T.O, Ward-3 (2) (4), Ahmedabad. Versus Shri Ashok Vadilal Patel</h3> The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed capital gains computation concerning land sale consideration rates. The CIT-A had directed the AO to adopt Rs. 618 per square ... Capital gain computation - determination rate of the land for working out the sale consideration for the purpose of capital gain - CIT-A directing the AO to adopt the rate of ₹ 618 per square meter with respect to the sale of property against the rate adopted by the AO at Rs. 1,670 per square meter - HELD THAT:- The issue on hand does not require any further consideration for the simple reason that the ITAT in the own case of the assessee in the appeal preferred by the assessee ASHOK VADILAL PATEL VERSUS ITO, WARD-3 (3) (1) AHMEDABAD. [2021 (1) TMI 1085 - ITAT AHMEDABAD] has directed the AO to adopt the rate for the sale of land at Rs. 200 per square meter. Admittedly, the decision rendered by the ITAT in the own case of the assessee as discussed above is binding on us. Therefore we have no other alternate except to follow the order as discussed aforesaid. - Decided against revenue. Issues:1. Discrepancy in the valuation of property for capital gain calculation between the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).Analysis:Issue 1: Discrepancy in property valuation for capital gain calculationThe case involved a dispute regarding the valuation of a property for calculating capital gains. The assessee had sold land at a rate of Rs. 200 per square meter, totaling Rs. 46,54,000. However, the Assessing Officer valued the land at Rs. 1,670 per square meter, resulting in a sale consideration of Rs. 3,88,60,900. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) reduced the valuation to Rs. 618 per square meter, partially allowing relief to the assessee. Both the Revenue and the assessee appealed to the ITAT, with the Revenue contesting the CIT(A)'s direction to adopt the lower rate of Rs. 618 per square meter. The ITAT noted that in a separate order related to the assessee's appeal, it had directed the AO to adopt the rate of Rs. 200 per square meter for the sale of land. This direction was based on the agreement between the parties and the stamp duty valuation at the time of agreement, emphasizing the importance of the date of agreement in determining the valuation for capital gains. The ITAT held that the decision in the assessee's case was binding, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.The ITAT's decision highlighted the significance of the agreement date and the stamp duty valuation at that time in determining the property valuation for capital gain calculation. The ITAT emphasized that the rate agreed upon between the parties in the agreement should be considered for valuation, especially when supported by stamp duty valuation. The ITAT's ruling underscored the importance of specific performance rights and encumbrances created by the agreement in determining the appropriate valuation for capital gains. The retrospective application of the second proviso to section 50C was also noted, allowing consideration of the date of agreement for valuation purposes. Ultimately, the ITAT's decision in the assessee's case, directing the adoption of the lower rate of Rs. 200 per square meter, was deemed binding, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found