Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suit for recovery arising from default in repayment under a loan agreement with a fixed EMI schedule was barred by limitation, and whether the applicable limitation provision was Article 55 or Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: Article 55 applies to suits for compensation for breach of contract, and may cover claims founded on breach where the agreement contemplates successive breaches. However, in the present case, the loan agreement fixed specific instalment dates, and the lender retained the contractual power to treat a defaulted EMI as an event of default and issue a recall notice. The period of limitation was therefore linked to the last defaulted instalment made the subject of recall, not merely to the date of the notice. On that basis, Article 113, the residuary provision, governed the suit. Section 3 of the Limitation Act, 1963, by itself, could not determine the applicable limitation period or justify dismissal on the footing adopted by the trial court.
Conclusion: The suit was not barred by limitation on the basis adopted by the trial court, and the finding on limitation was set aside in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a loan agreement prescribes fixed instalments and the lender has a contractual right to treat a defaulted instalment as an event of default, limitation for recovery runs from the relevant defaulted instalment and is governed by Article 113 of the Limitation Act, 1963, rather than Article 55.