Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether import of parts of air-pistols and airguns/rifles exempted under Schedule-I (III) (f) of the Arms Rules, 2016 required a licence in Form-X and inspection by the licensing authority under Rule 88 of the Arms Rules, 2016, and whether the consignments were liable to be released pending further consideration.
Analysis: The petition raised a controversy on the interplay between the exemption for such parts, the inspection mechanism contemplated under Rule 88, and the stand of the concerned authorities, including the DGFT. The order also noted that the consignments had been inspected in one matter and that the police report recorded conformity with the invoices and indicated that the goods fell within the exempted category. In the connected matters, further inspection by the Delhi Police was directed and the DGFT was impleaded to place its stand on affidavit.
Outcome: The customs authorities were directed to consider release of the consignments within one week if there was no other objection, without awaiting further orders, and the direction was stated to be without prejudice to the parties' contentions. Further inspection of the consignments in the connected matters was also directed.