1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed: Company Not Liable for 'Business Auxiliary', 'Support Service' or 'Intermediary' Categories.</h1> The SC dismissed the appeal, concluding that the respondent-Company did not meet the criteria for 'Business Auxiliary Service', 'Business Support ... Classification of service - Business Auxiliary Service - Business Support Service - Intermediary - it was held by CESTAT that The appellant does not satisfy the conditions to be an βintermediaryβ for his services and as such, the impugned order 08.07.2019 cannot sustain and is required to be set aside - HELD THAT:- The respondent-Company does not fall within the scope and ambit of any of the aforesaid definitions. This is having regard to the scope of its mandate to act on behalf of the principal namely primark. Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the respondent-Company did not fall within the definitions of 'Business Auxiliary Service', 'Business Support Service', or 'Intermediary'. The delay was condoned and pending applications were disposed of.