TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Company Not Liable for 'Business Auxiliary', 'Support Service' or 'Intermediary' Categories.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF G.S.T. AND CENTRAL EXCISE Versus M/s SNQS INTERNATIONAL SOCKS PRIVATE LIMITED</h3> The SC dismissed the appeal, concluding that the respondent-Company did not meet the criteria for 'Business Auxiliary Service', 'Business Support ... Classification of service - Business Auxiliary Service - Business Support Service - Intermediary - it was held by CESTAT that The appellant does not satisfy the conditions to be an ‘intermediary’ for his services and as such, the impugned order 08.07.2019 cannot sustain and is required to be set aside - HELD THAT:- The respondent-Company does not fall within the scope and ambit of any of the aforesaid definitions. This is having regard to the scope of its mandate to act on behalf of the principal namely primark. Appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as the respondent-Company did not fall within the definitions of 'Business Auxiliary Service', 'Business Support Service', or 'Intermediary'. The delay was condoned and pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
