Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against GST Return Error, Secures Right to Fair Hearing and Reconsideration of Order HC found petitioner's GST return error was inadvertent. Court quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against GST Return Error, Secures Right to Fair Hearing and Reconsideration of Order
HC found petitioner's GST return error was inadvertent. Court quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing, issue fresh order within two months, and reconsider the matter. Amounts previously appropriated will depend on remanded proceedings' outcome.
Issues involved: The primary challenge is the lack of a reasonable opportunity provided to the petitioner in an order dated 28.07.2023.
Details of the Judgment:
Issue 1: Lack of Reasonable Opportunity The petitioner, a registered person under applicable GST enactments engaged in the transport of goods, inadvertently failed to indicate GST leviable on services on a reverse charge basis in the GSTR 1 return for October 2019. Despite initiating proceedings related to the GSTR 1 return, the petitioner was unaware and could not participate until the impugned order was issued. The petitioner explained the error in a communication dated 22.01.2024 and requested another opportunity. The respondent had already appropriated the amount payable from the petitioner's bank account. The Court acknowledged the inadvertent error and the subsequent correction in the GSTR 3B and GSTR 9 returns. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remanded to the respondent for reconsideration. The respondent was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within two months. The amounts appropriated shall abide by the outcome of the remanded proceedings.
Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.