1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals Dismissed for 474-Day Delay; Withdrawal Allowed to Pursue NCLAT Remedies Without Prejudice to Future Actions.</h1> The SC dismissed the Civil Appeals due to a 474-day delay in filing, exceeding the condonable period under Section 62 of the IBC 2016. The appellants ... Condonation of delay of 474 days in filing the Civil Appeals - HELD THAT:- Even before the Special Leave Petition was filed, the period of limitation under Section 62 of the IBC had come to an end - There is a delay of 474 days in filing the Civil Appeals, much beyond the period which can be condoned in terms of the provisions of Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. There are no reason to entertain the Civil Appeals since they are barred by limitation - Since the appellants seek to withdraw the appeals, the appeals dismissed as withdrawn. Issues involved: Delay in filing Civil Appeals beyond the condonable period under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016.The Supreme Court noted that the impugned order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal was passed on 28 September 2022. The period of 45 days elapsed on 11 November 2022, and the further condonable period of 15 days on 26 November 2022. Even before the Special Leave Petition was filed, the period of limitation under Section 62 of the IBC had come to an end. The Court observed a delay of 474 days in filing the Civil Appeals, much beyond the period that can be condoned under the provisions of Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. Consequently, the Court was not inclined to entertain the Civil Appeals as they were barred by limitation.During the proceedings, Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, senior counsel for the appellants, expressed that the appellants wished to withdraw the Civil Appeals to pursue their remedies before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. On the other hand, Mr. Siddharth Dave, senior counsel for the respondents, objected to granting any liberty to the appellants. Considering the appellants' request to withdraw the appeals, the Court dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the course of action proposed to be followed by the appellants.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
