TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST Act Section 107 Appeal Dismissal: Limitation Provisions Form Exclusive Code Barring External Statutory Intervention</h1> <h3>M/s Yadav Scrap Traders Having Office At Pala Versus Additional Commissioner And Another</h3> The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging appeal dismissal under Section 107 of GST Act. The court held that the GST Act's limitation provisions ... Condonation of delay in filing appeal - appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation, as the same was filed approximately 73 days beyond the date of limitation - HELD THAT:- Section 107 of the GST Act prescribes a specific limitation period within which appeals against certain decisions must be filed. This limitation period is integral to the functioning of the appellate mechanism under the GST Act and reflects the legislative intent to expedite the resolution of tax disputes. By imposing a time limit on the filling of appeals, Section 107 aims to prevent undue delayed in the adjudication process and promote the efficient administration of the GST regime. On the other hand, Section 5 of the Limitation Act provides for the extension of prescribed periods in certain exceptional circumstances, such as when sufficient cause is shown for the delay. In analyzing the conflicting interpretations concerning the exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act as far as Section 107 of the GST Act is concerned, it is essential to consider the rationale behind the exclusion of the Limitation Act in certain special statues, particularly in the context of taxation. Tax laws are often characterized by strict procedural requirements and time-bound deadlines, reflecting the need for expeditious resolution of tax disputes to ensure revenue certainty and fiscal stability. The judgment rendered by the Calcutta High Court in the matter of S.K. Chakraborty & Sons [2023 (12) TMI 290 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] fails to adequately consider the authoritative pronouncements of the Supreme Court in the cases of Singh Enterprises [2007 (12) TMI 11 - SUPREME COURT] and Hongo India [2009 (3) TMI 31 - SUPREME COURT] and hence the said judgment is of no precedented value, and accordingly, the view expressed therein is not accepted by this Court. Taxing statutes like the GST Act embody a comprehensive framework with specific limitation provisions tailored to expedite the resolution of tax-related matters. Section 107 of the GST Act, operates as a complete code in itself, explicitly delineating limitation periods for filing appeals and implicitly excluding the application of general limitation provisions such as Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The present writ petition is without any merit and is dismissed. Issues:The judgment deals with the issue of limitation period for filing appeals under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The main contention revolves around whether Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 can be applied to extend the limitation period prescribed under the GST Act.Summary:Issue 1: Application of Section 5 of the Limitation Act to Section 107 of the GST ActThe petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the dismissal of their appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act on the grounds of limitation. The petitioner relied on a Division Bench judgment of the Calcutta High Court to argue that Section 5 of the Limitation Act should apply to extend the limitation period. However, the Allahabad High Court, citing precedents and the specific provisions of the GST Act, held that Section 107 operates as a self-contained code with an inbuilt mechanism for limitation, excluding the application of the general Limitation Act. The court emphasized that tax laws require strict adherence to procedural requirements and time-bound deadlines for efficient tax dispute resolution.Issue 2: Significance of Limitations in Taxing StatutesThe judgment underscores the importance of limitation provisions in taxing statutes like the GST Act. These provisions play a crucial role in ensuring timely resolution of tax disputes, promoting efficiency and fairness in tax administration. By imposing specific limitation periods, the legislative intent behind Section 107 of the GST Act is to expedite the resolution of tax-related matters, prevent undue delays in adjudication, and facilitate effective tax compliance. The court highlighted the need for legal certainty and timely determination of tax liabilities for both taxpayers and tax authorities.Conclusion:The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that Section 107 of the GST Act operates as a comprehensive framework with specific limitation provisions tailored to expedite tax dispute resolution. The judgment reiterates that the GST Act is a special statute with its own limitation mechanism, explicitly excluding the application of general limitation provisions like Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court rejected the petitioner's argument based on the Calcutta High Court judgment, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to tax laws and procedural requirements in the interest of efficient tax administration.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
