TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Order Invalidated: Department Must Reconsider Case with Proper Hearing and Comprehensive Evaluation of Petitioner's Submissions</h1> <h3>Svelte Furnitures Private Limited Versus Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 95 Delhi & Anr.</h3> Svelte Furnitures Private Limited Versus Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 95 Delhi & Anr. - 2024 (84) G. S. T. L. 36 (Del.) Issues involved:The judgment involves the challenge to Show Cause Notices dated 06.09.2023 and 29.09.2023 under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, alleging lack of details and non-compliance with the law.Impugned Show Cause Notices:The petitioner challenged the Show Cause Notices dated 06.09.2023 and 29.09.2023, claiming they lacked details and were not in line with the law. The department withdrew the first notice and adjudicated the second notice. The order passed on 31.12.2023 created a demand against the petitioner, citing the reply as non-comprehensive and unsupported by sufficient documents.Insufficient Consideration of Reply:The Court noted that the order dated 31.12.2023 did not consider the detailed reply filed by the petitioner to the Show Cause Notice. Consequently, the Court set aside the order and remitted the matter to the proper officer for re-adjudication, emphasizing the need to consider the petitioner's detailed response for a fair decision.Remedial Actions Ordered:The Court directed the proper officer to re-adjudicate the Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023, considering the petitioner's detailed reply. The officer was instructed to seek further clarification if needed and provide the petitioner with an opportunity to respond. A speaking order, including a personal hearing for the petitioner, was mandated within four weeks.Jurisdiction and Validity:The judgment left the issues of jurisdiction and validity of the Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 open for further consideration. The petitioner was advised to seek available legal remedies if still aggrieved by any subsequent order.Disposition of Petition:The petition was disposed of in accordance with the above terms, ensuring a fair re-adjudication process based on the petitioner's detailed response to the Show Cause Notice.
TaxTMI 