Regular bail in a GST prosecution depends on completed investigation, prima facie involvement, flight risk, and witness tampering concerns.

Regular bail may be granted in a CGST Act prosecution where investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed, subject to assessment of the nature of the accusation, the applicant's attributed role, prima facie involvement, the risk of absconding, and the likelihood of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The Court also considered the period of custody and the statutory punishment for the alleged offences, and on that basis granted bail.

---

---

Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 after completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet.

Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the nature of the accusation, the role attributed to the applicant, the completed investigation, and the filing of the charge-sheet. The Court also took note of the traditional bail considerations of prima facie involvement, likelihood of the accused remaining available for trial, and the possibility of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The period of custody and the statutory punishment attached to the alleged offences were also taken into account.

Conclusion: Regular bail was granted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed, regular bail may be granted on a consideration of prima facie case, risk of absconding, and the possibility of tampering with evidence.

---