Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount already deposited by the declarant under the earlier service tax compliance scheme, together with subsequent deposits, was required to be deducted while computing the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and whether the impugned computation in Form SVLDRS-3 was erroneous.
Analysis: The declared tax due was accepted by both sides. The relief under Section 124(1)(c)(ii) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 was 40% of the tax due, and Section 124(2) mandated deduction of any pre-deposit or deposit already made under the indirect tax enactment while issuing the statement of amount payable. The amounts deposited before and after the declaration were found to be deductible, and the computation in Form SVLDRS-3, which excluded part of these deposits, was held to be incorrect.
Conclusion: The amount payable had to be recomputed after giving credit for the entire deductible sum, and the impugned determination was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The declarant was entitled to adjustment of the full deductible deposits under the scheme, and the matter was directed to be closed on payment of the recomputed amount with interest.
Ratio Decidendi: While determining liability under the Sabka Vishwas scheme, all deductible pre-deposits and deposits already made in relation to the same tax demand must be given credit in computing the amount payable.