TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Petition, Leaves Lower Court's Ruling Enforceable and All Related Applications Concluded.</h1> <h3>KANTILAL BHAGUJI MOHITE Versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX-PUNE III</h3> The SC dismissed the special leave petition, indicating no inclination to interfere with the lower court's decision. All pending applications related to ... Compliance with the pre-deposit - Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India - petitioner desires to have an adjudication on merits without complying with this condition - it was held by High Court that If the petitioner/original appellant complies with the statutory condition of pre-deposit within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and reports compliance to the Tribunal, the Tribunal shall restore the appeal of the petitioner/original appellant for adjudication on merits. HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere in the matter - SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition as they were not inclined to interfere in the matter. Pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
