Appeal Dismissed: Tribunal and Commissioner Decision Upheld; Goods Transport Agency Complied with Notification Conditions.

The Court dismissed the appeal at the admission stage, upholding the decision of the Tribunal and the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata. It found that the Goods Transport Agency complied with the conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST, and the appellant's argument regarding the necessity of a consignment note declaration was without merit. The Court emphasized that the circular provided an option for declaration and did not prohibit separate declarations. The Tribunal's decision was based on factual findings and relevant evidence, leading to the conclusion that no substantial legal question was present.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are the challenge to an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the compliance with conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST by a Goods Transport Agency.

Summary:

Compliance with Notification No. 32/2004-ST:
The appellant challenged the Tribunal's order, arguing that the Goods Transport Agency did not fulfill the conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST in the consignment note. The appellant contended that a separate declaration by the GTA would not suffice to comply with the notification's conditions. However, the Court found no merit in this argument. The Court clarified that the circular relied upon by the appellant did not restrict the method of compliance to only the consignment note declaration. The circular aimed to facilitate the benefit under the notification by providing an option for declaration on the consignment note, but it did not prohibit a separate declaration.

Findings of the Commissioner and Tribunal:
The Court reviewed the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata, which confirmed that the conditions were met by the assessee, leading to the dropping of all proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision, stating that the conditions were indeed satisfied. The Court emphasized that these findings were based on factual considerations and relevant evidence on record. Consequently, the Court concluded that no substantial legal question arose from the Tribunal's order, given the detailed examination of facts in the Commissioner's original order. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed at the admission stage.

Overall, the Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and Commissioner, emphasizing the fulfillment of conditions by the assessee and the lack of legal grounds for challenging the Tribunal's order.

---