Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Oil rigs in India's exclusive zone not 'foreign going vessels' for Customs Act exemptions. Appeals dismissed.</h1> The court held that oil rigs operating in the exclusive economic zone/continental shelf of India do not qualify as 'foreign going vessels' under the ... Assessees did not pay the amount of sales tax so realised in that accounting year but claim deduction of the amount of sales tax collected during the last quarter of the accounting year – held that, sales tax collected in the last quarter of the accounting year was paid before the due date applicable for furnishing the return, could not be disallowed – deduction allowed – Tribunal was not correct in confirming the addition of sales tax - Tribunal has not correctly applied section 43B Issues Involved:1. Whether oil rigs engaged in operations in the exclusive economic zone/continental shelf of India, falling outside the territorial waters of India, are 'foreign going vessels' as defined by Section 2(21) of the Customs Act, 1962, and are entitled to consume imported stores thereon without payment of customs duty in terms of Section 87 of the Customs Act, 1962.Detailed Analysis:Principal Issue:- The main issue is whether oil rigs operating in the exclusive economic zone/continental shelf of India, outside the territorial waters, qualify as 'foreign going vessels' under Section 2(21) of the Customs Act, 1962, and if they are entitled to consume imported stores without paying customs duty under Section 87 of the Customs Act, 1962.Facts:- The appellants are engaged in offshore drilling operations under contracts with the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC). Initially, they were allowed to transship stores to oil rigs without customs duty. However, from November 1993, the Revenue Authorities refused this exemption, leading to legal challenges.Previous Judgments:- The Bombay High Court in Amership Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [(1996) 86 ELT 12 (Bom)] held that oil rigs are 'foreign going vessels' and entitled to exemptions under Sections 86(2), 87 read with Section 2(21) of the Customs Act, 1962. This decision was followed in subsequent cases, including the appellants' case.Relevant Notifications and Legal Provisions:- Various notifications under the Maritime Zones Act, 1976, extended the Customs Act and Customs Tariff Act to designated areas in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone.- Article 1(3) of the Constitution of India and Section 3(28) of the General Clauses Act define 'India' in a broad sense.- Section 2(21) of the Customs Act defines 'foreign going vessel,' and Section 87 provides exemptions for stores consumed on such vessels.Contentions by Appellants:- The appellants argued that their oil rigs, operating beyond 12 nautical miles from the shore, qualify as 'foreign going vessels' and should be exempt from customs duty under Sections 86(2) and 87.- They contended that the Maritime Zones Act, 1976, does not extend the territorial waters of India but only grants limited sovereign rights for resource exploitation.Contentions by Respondents:- The respondents argued that the designated areas in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone are part of India's territory for customs purposes, as per the Maritime Zones Act, 1976, and the related notifications.- They contended that the oil rigs are not 'foreign going vessels' because they operate within areas where India exercises sovereign rights and customs laws apply.Findings:- The court held that the territorial waters of India extend up to 12 nautical miles, and beyond that, India has limited sovereign rights in the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone.- Notifications under the Maritime Zones Act, 1976, extended the Customs Act to these areas, making them part of India's territory for customs purposes.- The court concluded that oil rigs operating in these designated areas are not 'foreign going vessels' under Section 2(21) of the Customs Act, and the stores consumed on these rigs are subject to customs duty.Conclusion:- The appeals were dismissed, and the court upheld the view that oil rigs in the designated areas are not entitled to the exemptions under Sections 86(2) and 87 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment emphasized the limited sovereign rights India has over the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone, making these areas part of India's territory for customs purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found