Delay in Filing Leads to Dismissal: SC Non-Interference Ends Proceedings After 206-Day Gap. The SC dismissed the special leave petition owing to a 206-day delay in filing, despite arguments from the petitioner's counsel. The delay was condoned, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delay in Filing Leads to Dismissal: SC Non-Interference Ends Proceedings After 206-Day Gap.
The SC dismissed the special leave petition owing to a 206-day delay in filing, despite arguments from the petitioner's counsel. The delay was condoned, but the SC chose not to interfere in the matter. All pending applications related to the case were disposed of, concluding the proceedings.
The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to a delay of 206 days in filing, despite hearing the petitioner's counsel. Delay was condoned, and no interference in the matter was made. Pending applications were disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.