Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted time to make the statutory pre-deposit for a second appeal in the absence of the GST Appellate Tribunal, and whether recovery of the assessed demand should remain in abeyance meanwhile.
Analysis: The writ petition was filed because the GST Appellate Tribunal had not been constituted, leaving the petitioner without the normal appellate forum. The statutory requirement under Section 112(8)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, as referred to in the order, requires deposit of 20% of the remaining tax in dispute as a condition for entertaining the second appeal. The petitioner undertook to make the deposit within two weeks and sought protection against coercive recovery until disposal of the writ petition.
Outcome: The petitioner was granted two weeks to deposit 20% of the remaining tax in dispute, and further demand was directed to remain in abeyance till disposal of the writ petition, failing which the authority would be free to enforce the demand.