Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte appellate order and the consolidated hearing notice fixing multiple dates at once violated the principles of natural justice and required the matter to be remanded for fresh decision.
Analysis: The record showed that the appeals were decided ex parte without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The notice for personal hearing granted three dates in one consolidated notice, which was held to be inconsistent with the statutory scheme governing adjournments and service of notice, and contrary to the requirement that a hearing be fixed date-wise and adjourned only on sufficient cause. In this context, the provisions governing personal hearing and service of notice were applied to hold that the procedure adopted was legally infirm and unfair.
Conclusion: The ex parte order was unsustainable. The matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh disposal on merits after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was restored for reconsideration in accordance with law, with the earlier appellate order set aside for breach of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: A consolidated notice fixing multiple hearing dates at once, followed by an ex parte decision without effective opportunity of hearing, violates the requirement of natural justice and cannot sustain the adjudication.