Serious economic offence and ongoing GST fraud investigation justified refusal of regular bail in alleged bogus input tax credit case.

In a case alleging fraudulent availing and passing on of input tax credit through forged firms and bogus invoices, the HC declined regular bail because the allegations disclosed a serious economic offence with substantial revenue implications. The Court noted that the investigation was still continuing and that the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses could not be ruled out. Applying bail principles in the context of grave economic offences, it held that the stage of investigation and the seriousness of the accusations weighed against release. The bail application was refused, and custody was continued pending expeditious completion of the investigation.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to be enlarged on regular bail in a case alleging fraudulent availing and passing on of input tax credit through forged firms and invoices.

Analysis: The allegations involved management of multiple forged firms, issuance of bogus invoices without supply of goods, and substantial loss to the Government exchequer. The investigation was stated to be continuing, and the Court found that the nature of the alleged GST fraud had wide revenue implications. It was also considered that the possibility of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses could not be ruled out. Applying the principles governing bail, particularly in serious economic offences, the Court held that the stage of investigation and the gravity of the accusations weighed against release on bail.

Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to regular bail.

Final Conclusion: The application for bail was refused, leaving the applicant in custody while directing expeditious completion of the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: In serious economic offences involving alleged fraudulent input tax credit and an ongoing investigation, bail may be declined where the allegations are grave and there is a reasonable apprehension of interference with evidence or witnesses.

---