2024 (1) TMI 996 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai dismisses capital gains appeal, allows treasury bill surplus treatment, deletes section 271(1)(c) penalties

Bajaj Auto Ltd. Versus DCIT Rg. 3 (1), Mumbai

Bajaj Auto Ltd. Versus DCIT Rg. 3 (1), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Taxability of surplus on redemption of securities under the head Capital Gain.2. Taxability of surplus on redemption of Treasury bills under the head 'Profits and Gains of Business'.3. Deduction of the cost of Dies and moulds leased to Job Workers.4. Reduction of the cost of the assets by the Penalty charges recovered for the purpose of granting depreciation.5. Deduction of expenditure incurred with respect to Masala Grinder and toaster.6. Disallowance of fines and penalties.7. Deduction in respect of Wealth Tax paid.8. Exclusion of job work receipts from total turnover while computing deduction under section 80HHC.9. Exclusion of costs incurred for manufacturing while computing indirect expenses in respect of traded goods for deduction under section 80HHC.10. Allowing deduction u/s 80 IA on profits after deducting depreciation.11. Disallowing deduction under Section 80-O in respect of royalty received.12. Exclusion of surrender of tenancy rights while computing the book profit as per section 115JA.13. Exclusion of indirect cost attributable to export of trading goods for deduction under section 80HHC.14. Inclusion of duty drawback and interest while computing deduction under section 80HH and 80IA.15. Addition on account of provision for doubtful debt.16. Deduction on account of provision for doubtful debts in the year of actual write-off.17. Deduction under section 35D in respect of GDR issue expenses.18. Depreciation in respect of sale and lease back transaction with JCT Limited.19. Allowing deduction in respect of expenditure incurred on dies and moulds as revenue expenditure.20. Allowing penalty charges recovered from suppliers of capital goods as capital receipts.21. Allowing deduction of expenditure incurred in respect of jigs and fixtures as revenue expenditure.22. Allowing deduction in respect of proportionate premium on leasehold land.23. Allowability of deduction in respect of foreign traveling expenses of wife of Managing Director.24. Deleting disallowance of proportionate interest expense attributable to earning exempt income.25. Allowing deduction for prior period of expenses.26. Exclusion of 90% of certain receipts from the profits of the business while computing deduction under section 80HHC.27. Allowance of deduction u/s 40(a)(i) in respect of expenditure incurred in foreign currency.28. Deletion of interest u/s 234B.Summary:1. Taxability of Surplus on Redemption of Securities:The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision that the surplus on redemption is liable to tax under the head Capital Gain, following the Supreme Court's decision in Grace Collins v/s CIT.2. Surplus on Redemption of Treasury Bills:The ITAT directed the AO to assess the surplus on redemption of Treasury bills as capital gains, following the Bombay High Court's decision in British Bank of Middle East v/s CIT.3. Deduction of Cost of Dies and Moulds:The assessee did not press this ground, and it was dismissed.4. Reduction of Cost of Assets by Penalty Charges:This ground was also not pressed by the assessee and was dismissed.5. Deduction for Masala Grinder and Toaster:The ITAT directed the AO to delete the addition made towards expenditure on Masala Grinder and Toaster after verification.6. Disallowance of Fines and Penalties:The ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.7. Deduction of Wealth Tax Paid:The ITAT directed the AO to delete the disallowance of wealth tax paid, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.8. Exclusion of Job Work Receipts:This ground was not pressed by the assessee and was dismissed.9. Exclusion of Costs for Manufacturing:This ground was not pressed by the assessee and was dismissed.10. Deduction u/s 80 IA after Depreciation:The ITAT dismissed this ground, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.11. Deduction u/s 80-O for Royalty:The ITAT allowed the deduction, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.12. Exclusion of Surrender of Tenancy Rights:This ground was not pressed by the assessee and was dismissed.13. Exclusion of Indirect Cost for Export of Trading Goods:The ITAT allowed this ground, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.14. Inclusion of Duty Drawback and Interest:The ITAT directed the AO to allow deduction u/s 80 IA for duty drawback and interest income, following the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v/s Meghalaya Steels Ltd.15. Addition for Provision for Doubtful Debt:The ITAT restored this issue to the AO for fresh decision, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.16. Deduction for Provision for Doubtful Debts in Year of Write-off:This ground was dismissed as it became infructuous after adjudicating the previous ground.17. Deduction u/s 35D for GDR Issue Expenses:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.18. Depreciation for Sale and Lease Back with JCT Limited:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.19. Deduction for Expenditure on Dies and Moulds:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.20. Penalty Charges from Suppliers of Capital Goods:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.21. Deduction for Expenditure on Jigs and Fixtures:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.22. Deduction for Proportionate Premium on Leasehold Land:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.23. Foreign Traveling Expenses of Wife of Managing Director:The ITAT allowed the revenue's appeal, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision.24. Disallowance of Proportionate Interest:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.25. Deduction for Prior Period Expenses:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.26. Exclusion of 90% of Certain Receipts:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.27. Deduction u/s 40(a)(i) for Foreign Currency Expenditure:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the co-ordinate bench's decision in previous years.28. Deletion of Interest u/s 234B:The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal, following the verification of advance tax paid by the assessee.