1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Export goods duty rate determined by let export order date under Section 16, not Sections 18-19</h1> CESTAT Bangalore held that for export goods, the relevant date for determining customs duty rate is the date of let export order under Section 16 of the ... Refund of Customs Duty - refund denied on the ground that the benefit of reduction in the rate of duty cannot be extended to the goods - what is the relevant date for payment of duty in the case of goods being exported? - HELD THAT:- The relevant Sections to determine the rate of duty is Section 16 read with Section 50 of the Customs Act ,1962. The reliance placed on Section 18 and 19 of the Customs Act, 1962 by the Commissioner (Appeals) is irrelevant as far as determination of rate of duty is concerned - As per Section 16, the date of βlet export orderβ is the date for determining the rate of duty. This view is also upheld by the Honβble High court of Bombay in the case of NARAYAN BANDEKAR & SONS PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMR. OF CUS. & C. EX, GOA [2010 (8) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]. The impugned order is set aside and the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed. Issues involved: Determination of relevant date for payment of duty on exported goods.Summary:Issue 1: Relevant date for payment of duty on exported goodsThe case involved a dispute regarding the relevant date for determining the rate of duty on exported goods. The respondent filed a refund claim after a reduction in duty rates subsequent to the assessment and payment of duty on the goods. The original authority rejected the claim based on the date of the 'Let export order,' while the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund claim considering the date of loading of the goods into the vessel as the relevant date. The Revenue appealed against this decision.Details:The Tribunal analyzed Section 16 of the Customs Act, 1962, which specifies that the rate of duty applicable to export goods shall be determined based on the date of the proper officer's order permitting clearance and loading for exportation. The Tribunal referred to relevant legal provisions and precedents, including a case from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, to emphasize that the date of the 'Let export order' is crucial for determining the duty rate. The Tribunal highlighted that the actual loading date is irrelevant for this determination.Significant Legal References:- Section 16 of the Customs Act, 1962- Relevant case law from the Hon'ble High Court of BombayKey Points:- The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of the 'Let export order' date for duty rate determination.- The Tribunal's decision aligned with legal provisions and established legal precedents, dismissing the relevance of the actual loading date for duty rate calculation.*Separate Judgement:*No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.