Provident fund dues remain protected from the liquidation estate, while belated insolvency claims for interest and penalty can be rejected.

Provident fund dues admitted in Form B were treated as statutory dues excluded from the liquidation estate, and because the claim had already been recognised in the insolvency process, it had to be paid by the resolution applicant under the approved resolution plan. By contrast, the later assessed interest and penalty were not crystallized within the insolvency timelines and were not part of the timely filed claim, so they could not be compelled to be admitted at that stage. The appeal therefore succeeded only on the admitted provident fund component and failed on the belated interest and penalty claim.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the provident fund contribution already admitted in Form B had to be paid by the resolution applicant and was outside the liquidation estate. (ii) Whether the belatedly assessed amount towards interest and penalty, crystallized after the insolvency timeline, could be admitted and directed to be considered as part of the claim.

Issue (i): Whether the provident fund contribution already admitted in Form B had to be paid by the resolution applicant and was outside the liquidation estate.

Analysis: The admitted provident fund contribution was treated as statutory dues. The insolvency framework excludes provident fund dues from the liquidation estate, and once the claim stood admitted in the insolvency process, it was liable to be dealt with in accordance with the approved resolution plan. The claim already recognized in Form B was therefore not liable to be denied merely because the resolution plan had proceeded to approval.

Conclusion: In favour of the assessee. The admitted amount of provident fund contribution was directed to be paid by the resolution applicant.

Issue (ii): Whether the belatedly assessed amount towards interest and penalty, crystallized after the insolvency timeline, could be admitted and directed to be considered as part of the claim.

Analysis: The additional amount towards interest and penalty was not crystallized when the claim process was underway and was assessed only later, beyond the period prescribed for submission and consideration of claims under the insolvency regime. Since the amount was not part of the claim as timely filed in Form B and was determined after expiry of the relevant timelines, it could not be compelled to be admitted at that stage.

Conclusion: Against the assessee. The belated claim for interest and penalty was rightly rejected.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed only to the limited extent of the admitted provident fund dues, while the challenge to rejection of the belatedly assessed interest and penalty claim failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A claim under the insolvency process must be timely and crystallized within the prescribed framework to be admitted, while admitted provident fund dues remain protected from the liquidation estate and are payable in accordance with the resolution plan.

---