ITAT deletes section 271(1)(c) penalties for process loss disallowance and land sale profit treatment disputes

ITAT Ahmedabad deleted penalties under section 271(1)(c) imposed on assessee for process loss disallowance and treatment of land/flat sale profits as business income instead of capital gains. Tribunal held that mere unsustainable claims do not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, following Supreme Court precedent in Reliance Petroproducts case. Additionally, disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) regarding interest payments to directors was deleted due to revenue neutrality, as directors offered interest income in their returns while providing personal guarantees for company loans without charging guarantee commission.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Delay in filing the appeal.
2. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2012-13.
3. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2015-16.
4. Disallowance of interest under section 40A(2)(b) for Assessment Year 2016-17.

Summary:

1. Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No. 277/Ahd/2020 faced a 53-day delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the Supreme Court's judgment dated 23.03.2020, the time limit for filing appeals was extended from 15.03.2020, making the appeal timely and acceptable.

2. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2012-13:
The assessee, a Private Limited Company, had its return of income partially disallowed, leading to a penalty of Rs. 1,77,99,323/- for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the penalty, stating that the assessee had provided all particulars and that the disallowance did not justify the penalty. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing that mere disallowance of a claim does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal referenced several case laws, including Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd., to support the deletion of the penalty.

3. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2015-16:
The only issue was the disallowance of process loss of Rs. 4,62,359/-, leading to a penalty of Rs. 1,42,868/-. The Tribunal, referencing its earlier decision in ITA No. 1189/Ahd/2019, deleted the penalty, stating that the disallowance was based on an estimate and did not justify the penalty under section 271(1)(c).

4. Disallowance of Interest under Section 40A(2)(b) for Assessment Year 2016-17:
The assessee paid higher interest rates (18%) to its Chairman and Director compared to others (12%), leading to a disallowance of Rs. 75,00,138/-. The Tribunal found that the higher interest was justified due to personal guarantees provided by the Chairman and Director for the company's loans, which is a normal business practice. The Tribunal noted that similar disallowances in previous years were deleted by the CIT(A) and that the interest paid was disclosed and taxed in the recipients' returns, making the disallowance unnecessary. The Tribunal deleted the addition, emphasizing revenue neutrality and business exigency.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeals, deleting the penalties and disallowances in question.

---