Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were fully explainable from agricultural receipts, or whether part of the deposits were liable to be treated as unexplained money under section 69.
Analysis: The assessee produced land-holding records, revenue certificates and cash receipts to support the claim that the deposits arose from agricultural operations, and the assessment record did not dispute that agricultural activity was being carried on. At the same time, complete evidence was not available to explain the entire cash deposit of Rs. 11,54,500/-. In these circumstances, the source of deposits had to be estimated on the material available. The explanation was accepted only to the extent supported by the record, and the balance was treated as not satisfactorily explained.
Conclusion: The claim of agricultural source was accepted in part, and only the balance cash deposit was sustained as unexplained money taxable under section 69.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee substantiates agricultural activity but fails to fully explain cash deposits, the explained portion may be accepted on estimation and the balance may be assessed as unexplained money under section 69.