Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dues of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs were required to be paid in accordance with the distribution waterfall under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The order records that the question of limitation required consideration, but instead of entering into a detailed adjudication or ordering remand, the Court accepted disposal of the appeal with a specific clarification regarding the manner in which the dues were to be paid. The clarification ties the claim of the Customs department to the statutory waterfall under the insolvency framework.
Conclusion: The dues of the Customs department are to be paid in accordance with the waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the appeal stands disposed of on that basis.