Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee cannot claim fresh Section 80IA deduction in return filed under Section 153A when not claimed originally</h1> <h3>Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2 (1), Hyderabad Versus M/s. HES Infra Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad.</h3> Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2 (1), Hyderabad Versus M/s. HES Infra Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Whether the CIT(A) erred in granting deduction u/s 80IA for the first time in return filed in response to notice u/s 153A.2. Whether the CIT(A) erred in allowing deduction u/s 80IA without examining if the assessee satisfies the parameters set by ITAT in previous cases.3. Whether the assessee can claim deduction u/s 80IA in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A if it was not claimed in the original return of income.Summary:Issue 1: Deduction u/s 80IA in Return Filed in Response to Notice u/s 153AThe Revenue argued that the CIT(A) erred in granting the deduction u/s 80IA, as the claim was made for the first time in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A. The assessee originally did not claim the deduction in the return filed u/s 139(1). The Tribunal held that the assessee cannot be permitted to make a fresh claim of deduction in the re-assessment proceedings u/s 153A, as the return of income filed in response to notice u/s 153A must comply with the provisions of section 139, including the due date for filing the return.Issue 2: Parameters for Deduction u/s 80IAThe Revenue contended that the CIT(A) allowed the deduction without examining whether the assessee met the parameters fixed by the ITAT in the case of Sushi Hitech, which include developing, operating, and maintaining any infrastructure facility. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was engaged in infrastructural activities but was not the owner of the infrastructure facilities, which were owned by the government departments. Therefore, the assessee did not satisfy the conditions for claiming the deduction u/s 80IA.Issue 3: Fresh Claim of Deduction in Return Filed u/s 153AThe Tribunal emphasized that the re-assessment proceedings u/s 153A are not de novo assessments and can only address issues related to incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal referred to section 80AC, which mandates that deductions under section 80IA can only be claimed if the return is filed on or before the due date specified under section 139(1). Since the assessee did not claim the deduction in the original return or during the original assessment proceedings, the Tribunal held that the fresh claim made in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A is not permissible.Conclusion:The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, reversing the CIT(A)'s order and restoring the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the deduction u/s 80IA. The appeals by the Revenue were allowed, and the assessee was not permitted to make a fresh claim of deduction in the re-assessment proceedings u/s 153A.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found