TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court remands excise duty case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing corporate facade.</h1> <h3>GAJANAN FABRICS DISTRIBUTORS Versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE</h3> The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal's order in a case involving excise duty demands due to lack of clear calculations. The case is remanded to the ... Demand - Manufacturer - Dummy - SSI exemption - Clubbing - Held that: - By confirming the demand upon all the seven units the Collector appears, however, to have treated them all as assessees and, implicitly recognised their independent existence - facts required to be reconsidered - appeal allowed by way of remand. The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal's order in a case involving excise duty demands due to lack of clear calculations. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication considering the corporate facade of the units involved. The parties can submit additional documents, and the decision should not refer to previous orders. No costs are awarded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
