Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods supplied for use in pumping stations for conveying water to a water treatment plant were eligible for exemption under the relevant notification and consequent refund, when supported by certificates issued by the District Collector.
Analysis: The exemption covered all items of machinery, instruments, apparatus, appliances, auxiliary equipment and components required for setting up water treatment plants. The condition attached to the notification required production of a certificate from the competent district authority stating that the goods were cleared for the intended use specified in the notification. The certificates in the present case showed that the goods were intended for the pumping station and the water supply project, and the pumping station was an integral part of the process of setting up the water treatment plant because water had to be conveyed from the source to the plant before treatment could occur. The exclusion of the entire project was not supported by the wording of the notification, and the departmental view that the goods had to be physically used only within the treatment plant itself was not accepted.
Conclusion: The goods were eligible for the exemption, and rejection of the refund claims was not justified. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.